Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Wendy Saul's avatar

My friend Ted, himself and immigrant and always an A+ student in a sea of A friends, wrote saying that he had always seen the story of the story of Jack and the Beanstalk as an introduction to “adolescent phallic self-assertion” rather than an immigration narrative.” (He goes on—as I invite him to do here) to compare the Ogre to Trump.

Ted is right, of course, on all counts, but my comparison came from a different place. I realized that the Rappoports seemed immune to feelings of guilt and shame. Were they like the Greek gods in that regard? But that comparison literally reified them and made them more powerful than they were or even thought they were.

Then my friend Rosemary pointed out the characters in folktales also never entertained guilt. Here was Jack, for instance, who not only felt justified in stealing the giant’s gold, but also went back again and again for more. Moreover, like other tricksters, he fooled the giant’s kind wife who furthered his aims, and then finally, he killed the giant himself.

This reading surely doesn’t give in or sympathize with the tale as Ted’s interpretation does, but it did help me name a feeling I wanted to talk about.

This is all just to say that the same story can serve different functions for the reader. My next post will address that point.

Expand full comment
Wendy Saul's avatar

Phil wasn't all bad, either. I guess few are.

Thanks for being readers. You keep me writing.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts